Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Most/Least Affordable Cities 2 Buy A HOME

According to the results of a recent nationwide industry analysis of housing markets compiled by Wells Fargo (WFC) and the National Association of Homebuilders, below are Lists of the Top 10 Most and Least Affordable large U.S. Cities to purchase a home. Per the study, large U.S. cities under consideration referred to only those cities with populations larger than 500,000 citizens. Also worth noting, and per the below link, in terms of the calculated 'affordability index' metric, "...To be deemed affordable, a family making the median national income of $64,000 must be able to buy the property and devote no more than 28% of their income toward housing costs."


Top 10 MOST Affordable U.S. Cities:
(Rank -- City -- Affordability Index -- Median Home Price)
1. Indianapolis, Indiana -- 94.8 -- $98,000
2. Youngstown, Ohio -- 94.4 -- $67,000
3. Akron, Ohio -- 93 -- $78,000
4. Grand Rapids, Michigan -- 91.8 -- $97,000
5. Syracuse, New York -- 91.3 -- $85,000
6. Warren, Michigan -- 91.2 -- $119,000
7. Cleveland, Ohio -- 91 -- $86,000
8. Buffalo, New York -- 90.4 -- $90,000
9. Toledo, Ohio -- 90.2 -- $78,000
10. Dayton, Ohio -- 90 -- $85,000


Top 10 LEAST Affordable U.S. Cities:
(Rank -- City -- Affordability Index -- Median Home Price)
1. New York, New York -- 21.5 -- $418,000
2. San Francisco, California -- 32.1 -- $525,000
3. Los Angeles, California -- 42.1 -- $288,000
4. Nassau-Suffolk, New York -- 43 -- $375,000
5. Honolulu, Hawaii -- 44.1 -- $360,000
6. Santa Ana, California -- 48.2 -- $360,000
7. Newark, New Jersey -- 49.3 -- $315,000
8. Miami, Florida -- 49.6 -- $185,000
9. McAllen, Texas -- 50.3 -- $160,000
10. El Paso, Texas -- 52.9 -- $127,000


realestate.yahoo.com/homes-most-affordable-in-2-decades


Data Courtesy: Yahoo Real Estate, NAHB and Wells Fargo

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

The Notorious AIG Bonuses And The LAW

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal recently sat down with Fox News commentator Glenn Beck to debate the $220 million AIG bonus fiasco. What transpired was an especially lively and spirited debate focused on the United States government's 'legal authority' to take back the bonuses contractually guaranteed to AIG employees.

In terms of background, American International Group (AIG) is the NOTORIOUS U.S. financial products company that foolishly risked and LOST the house on sour, unregulated credit default swap (CDS) investment bets. The only reason AIG even exists today is because of the U.S. government's highly controversial September 2008 decision to intervene in the financial markets and assume the company's gigantic GLOBAL liabilities. To date, the government has essentially taken over the insurance behemoth by infusing it with approximately $180 Billion in U.S. taxpayer funds in return for an 80% ownership stake.


While I most certainly understand and empathize with the public's justifiable OUTRAGE (...there are after all 180 BILLION reasons to be OUTRAGED over these bonus payouts...), I believe Mr. Beck's assessment is fair and share his concerns regarding precedent and the 'Slippery Slope of LAW' issue now facing the country.


Part 1:



Part 2:




Data Courtesy
: Fox News

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Top 10 Largest TARP-Funded STATES

The Top 10 Largest TARP-Funded $TATES (as of 1/15/09):


1. New York - 19 Banks have received $80.3 Billion

2.
North Carolina - 17 Banks rec'd $28.5 Billion

3.
California - 38 Banks rec'd $27.4 Billion

4.
Pennsylvania - 12 Banks rec'd $8.6 Billion

5.
Ohio - 11 Banks rec'd $7.6 Billion

6.
Minnesota - 4 Banks rec'd $7.0 Billion

7.
Georgia - 8 Banks rec'd $6.1 Billion

8.
Virginia - 14 Banks rec'd $4.0 Billion

9.
Alabama - 4 Banks rec'd $3.6 Billion

10.
Texas - 7 Banks rec'd $2.7 Billion


wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_BANKMONEY_20081027.html


Data Courtesy
: The Wall Street Journal
+ U.S. Treasury Dept

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

New York City's Commercial (OFFICE) Space

Some interesting MANHATTAN Commercial Real Estate Market STATS courtesy of Bloomberg:

* According to real estate broker Cushman & Wakefield,
AVERAGE 4th QUARTER RENTS in Manhattan dropped 4.8% from 3Q08 to $69.44 a square foot


* Total 2008 OFFICE SPACE LEASING ACTIVITY in Manhattan dropped to 19.1 million square feet...the lowest level since 2001



*
AVAILABLE LEASING SPACE in Manhattan increased by 43% over year end 2007 to more than 31 million square feet (...AVAILABLE Sublease space in Manhattan more than doubled in 2008 to 8.2 million square feet...)


* Across the
entire United States, OFFICE VACANCIES rose to 14.4% during 4Q08...during this time, 'asking rents' actually fell 0.3%


* According to broker Studley Inc,
MANHATTAN OFFICE VACANCIES rose to 10.4% during 4Q08...the 1.5% increase over 3Q08 is the largest quarterly increase 'in supply' since the 3rd quarter of 2001


bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZZvAeQPT


Data Courtesy
: Bloomberg

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

New York - 165,000 In Job Losses Thru 2010


Per a CNBC television interview earlier this morning with
New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson Jr. (click on the below link for the video interview) :


* New York is forecasting additional NY job losses of 165,000 through 2010

* Wall Street job losses are expected to make up about 35,000 (or approx 20%) of the 165,000 jobs lost

* New York state doesn't expect to see a bottom in the current economic downturn until at least the beginning of 2010


Data Courtesy: CNBC

Monday, November 17, 2008

Citigroup Cuts 50,000 Jobs !

Due to the ongoing GLOBAL recession, Citigroup (C) Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit announced today his company's intentions to lay off more than 50,000 employees in the 'near term'. The job cuts are a direct result of Citigroup's COST reduction efforts and will enable the major New-York based bank to stay competitive by reducing total company expenses by approximately 20% in 2009 to $50 Billion (versus the $62 Billion they spent during 2008).


Per the below link:
* Citigroup will reduce employee headcount by about 15% to 300K employees worldwide (as of September 30th, 2008, Citigroup employed approx 352,000 employees)

* Citigroup laid off an additional 23,000 employees earlier in 2008

* Even with Citi's loss of about 75K jobs during 2008, Citigroup remains the largest U.S. bank by employee headcount

* According to data compiled by Bloomberg, banks and brokerage firms worldwide have now announced more than 200,000 Job Cuts in the financial sector since the beginning of the subprime mortgage market collapse in 2007 !


bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid


Data Courtesy: Bloomberg

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Top 10 Hardest Hit 'Wall Street Towns'

Make no mistake about it, Wall Street's epic slowdown will have a severe economic impact to individuals living both INside and OUTside of New York City. For my reference, a Businessweek-created List of the Top 10 Towns that will most likely be hit the hardest as a result of Wall Street's recent collapse:

Businessweek's List of Top 10 Hardest Hit Towns


1. Darien, Connecticut
Share population in finance and real estate: 27.23%
Nearest large city: New York
Population: 20,666
Median salary: $168,687

2. Bloomington, Illinois
Share population in finance and real estate: 26.31%
Nearest large city: Chicago
Population: 70,395
Median salary: $54,971

3. Hoboken, New Jersey
Share population in finance and real estate: 23.33%
Nearest large city: New York
Population: 40,002
Median salary: $81,356

4. West Des Moines, Iowa
Share population in finance and real estate: 22.15%
Nearest large city: Des Moines
Population: 54,627
Median salary: $61,303

5. Garden City, New York
Share population in finance and real estate: 20.22%
Nearest large city: New York
Population: 21,671
Median salary: $121,831

6. Summit, New Jersey
Share population in finance and real estate: 19.74%
Nearest large city: New York
Population: 20,618
Median salary: $111,497

7. Westport, Connecticut
Share population in finance and real estate: 19.39%
Nearest large city: New York
Population: 26,822
Median salary: $137,133

8. University Park, Texas
Share population in finance and real estate: 18.83%
Nearest large city: Dallas
Population: 24,582
Median salary: $110,976

9. Wethersfield, Connecticut
Share population in finance and real estate: 18.73%
Nearest large city: Hartford
Population: 26,146
Median salary: $63,359

10. Mountain Brook, Alabama
Share population in finance and real estate: 18.66%
Nearest large city: Birmingham
Population: 20,654
Median salary: $115,148


Towns-That-Could-Be-Hit-Hardest-by-the-Financial-Crisis


Data Courtesy: Businessweek

Wall Street's 2003-07 Housing BOOM Exces$

During the 5 year U.S. Housing 'BOOM' from 2003 to 2007, Wall Street's 5 Largest firms (Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bear Sterns and Lehman Brothers) paid their Top 5 Executives a total of more than $3 Billion in compensation!


Three BILLION dollars is of course a stunning amount of money in ANY context but especially so when considering the rather DIRE solvency/financial challenges these same firms have faced over the course of the past 6 months...NAMELY:

* Bear Sterns (the artist formerly known as BSC) was forced into bankruptcy in March

* Lehman Brothers (the artist formerly known as LEH) was forced to declare bankruptcy in September

* Merrill Lynch (MER), in order to avoid being forced into bankruptcy, was forced to sell itself to Bank of America (BAC) in September

* OH yeah, don't forget about that little $700 BILLION Wall Street 'Bailout/Rescue Plan' that was just approved by Congress this weekend !

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the informative Bloomberg article linked below:


* The 5 Wall Street firms had combined Net Income (profits) of $93 Billion during the five years through 2007

* Of the $3.1 Billion paid to the top five executives at the firms between 2003 and 2007, Goldman Sachs (GS) paid the highest total with $859 million, followed by Bear Stearns at $609 million...CEO pay at the five firms increased each year, doubling to $253 million in 2007, according to data compiled from company filings

* Merrill Lynch (MER) paid its chief executives the most, with former CEO Stanley O'Neal taking in $172 million from 2003 to 2007 and John Thain receiving $86 million, including a signing bonus, after beginning work in December 2007

* Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne made $161 million before the company collapsed in March and was sold to JPMorgan (JPM) with monetary backing provided by the U.S. Federal Reserve

* Hank Paulson, the current U.S. Treasury Secretary and former CEO of Goldman Sachs, made about $111 million from 2003-2006...current Goldman Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein received $57.6 million in 2007

* Morgan Stanley's (MS) current and former chief executives, John Mack and Philip Purcell, were paid about $194 million over the last five years.

* Lehman's Chief Executive Officer Richard Fuld made $165 million between 2003 and 2007


* Lastly, it should be noted that Excessive compensation was NOT limited to Wall Street's top executives as Wall Street firms have paid employees a greater share of revenue than any other industry, about 50%...The five Largest firms paid their 185,687 employees $66 Billion in 2007, including about $39 Billion in bonuses...That amounts to an average pay of $353,089 per employee, including an average bonus of $211,849.


Data Courtesy
: Bloomberg
Full Disclosure: I own shares of GS.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Fitz On Housing + Wall $treet's Impact On NY


Per RealMoney.com contributor Dan Fitzpatrick, behold some somewhat obvious but nonetheless poignant words I believe are worth noting related to what's needed for a BOTTOM + Sustainable Recovery in U.S. Housing/Real Estate prices:

The Order of Economic Recovery

By Dan Fitzpatrick
9/19/08 11:30 AM EDT

"Just a quick note this morning. Those who are eagerly looking at the real estate market with optimism that the worst is over are looking the wrong way. Houses are the ultimate Big Ticket Item. They are generally not bought until the consumer feels confident in his earning capacity by way of a steady JOB with upside potential. We need an economic recovery BEFORE real estate moves higher...not the other way around. It has always been that way, and will always be that way. Not my opinion -- it is a fact."


---------------------------------------------------------------------


*
Anecdotally thinking and speaking of real estate, one of the select FEW pockets of strength for the post-2005 U.S. real estate market was Manhattan, New York. This will most certainly NOT be the case moving forward for at least the next 5-10 years following the EPIC collapses of former WALL STREET giants Bear Sterns (the artist formerly known as BSC), Lehman Brothers (the artist formerly known as LEH), Merrill Lynch (MER...soon to become a piece of Bank of America/BAC), American Insurance Group (AIG...now 80% owned by the Federal Government), etc.

In attempting to quickly assess the potential
Ramifications of a WOUNDED Wall Street to NEW YORK's economy (and therefore to New York's real estate market), it should be noted that per August 2008 comments from Thomas DiNapoli (the 'Comptroller of the State of New York'...also commonly referred to as the 'Chief Fiscal Officer of New York State') :

* Wall Street firms make up approximately 20% of New York STATE's total tax revenues

* Wall Street contributes about
9% of New York CITY's total tax revenues.


bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYhqIluVHh7U&refer=home



Data Courtesy
: Realmoney.com (subscription only) + Bloomberg